The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) received 27.19 billion rupees, or 93% of the total 29.02 billion rupees donated to 13 political parties through electoral bonds between April 12 and May 10, 2019, as per the Election Commission of India’s data released on March 21, The Wire reports.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, recently arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a money laundering case tied to an alleged liquor policy scam, has contested his arrest in the Delhi High Court. Meanwhile, the German government commented on the situation, which led a formal protest from India.

In a general election, voters must carefully examine how various political parties plan to address major national concerns, including economic policies, national security and international relations. Voters should also critically evaluate whether their lives and those of their family members have improved or worsened, and to determine whether the policies proposed by any political entity prioritise the common good or are mainly self-serving.

The Congress Party has accused the government of freezing its bank accounts, hindering its campaign efforts for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. The party says this move undermines democracy in the country.

The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) was enforced on March 16, establishing guidelines for the behaviour of the government, political parties, candidates and the media to guarantee free and fair elections. It specifically tackles the use of religion in election campaigns, understanding which is essential for us to identify and report any infractions.

A collaborative media report shows the financial advantages of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), particularly through electoral bonds, just weeks before India’s general election. The BJP justifies its substantial financial intake as being proportionate to its share in Parliament. However, the question arises: does this argument hold up under democratic scrutiny?

Thirty-five pharmaceutical companies in India have channelled nearly 10 billion rupees crore into political parties through electoral bonds, with at least seven under investigation for substandard drugs during their purchase, according to a media report, which raises concerns about the influence of the pharmaceutical sector on political and regulatory environments.

Companies previously marked as “high risk” for violating the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) were subsequently removed from the list after purchasing substantial amounts of electoral bonds, according to an investigation by The Wire. The revelation adds a new dimension to the controversy surrounding the electoral bond scheme, which has been criticised for lacking transparency and favouring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA), now in effect in India, facilitates citizenship for undocumented non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The government claims that Muslims are exempt from this provision because these Muslim-majority countries do not subject Muslims to persecution. However, this claim neglects the reality of severe religious persecution of Muslim minorities within these nations.

A significant number of companies, previously raided by central agencies, have been found purchasing electoral bonds in large amounts. This information has come after the Election Commission of India (ECI) disclosed political donations revealing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as the primary beneficiary, weeks before the 2024 Lok Sabha election.

A New Delhi-based electoral trust has raised $272 million through major Indian corporations over the last 10 years and directed about 75% of the amount to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), according to Reuters, which raises concerns about the fairness and transparency of political funding in India, especially in the context of the upcoming general election.

The Bombay High Court has passed an interim order on the 2023 Information Technology (IT) Rules Amendment, particularly Rule 3(1)(b)(v), which has significant implications for freedom of expression. This rule empowers the government to establish a Fact Check Unit (FCU) and unilaterally declare online content related to the government’s business as fake, false, or misleading, which has raised concerns about potential censorship and the impact on free speech.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) of India has told the Supreme Court that Gautam Navlakha, a human rights activist arrested in August 2018 in connection with the Bhima Koregaon case, must pay 16.4 million rupees for his house arrest expenses, as reported by Scroll.in.

The Supreme Court of India has affirmed the right to free speech, stating that a citizen cannot be prosecuted for criticising government actions or extending good wishes to citizens of another country, such as Pakistan, on their independence day. The division bench, comprising Justices Abhay Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, underlined the fundamental right to free speech under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.

In a surprising turn of events, Arun Goel, an Election Commissioner (EC), has stepped down, leaving the Election Commission of India (ECI) with only the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Rajiv Kumar, at the helm, just weeks before the general elections. Goel, whose tenure was expected to extend until December 2027, departed without offering a public explanation. This development comes on the heels of the retirement of another EC, Anup Pandey, plunging the ECI into a significant staffing crisis at a pivotal time.

The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) in India has been without a Chairperson since Harsh Chouhan resigned in June 2023, eight months before his term was due to end. The positions of Vice-Chairperson and three other members are also vacant, leaving all five key posts of the NCST unfilled.

The State Bank of India (SBI) has requested the Supreme Court to extend the deadline to June 30 for providing details of electoral bonds. The request comes after the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a fund-raising scheme that allowed political donors to remain anonymous, demanding SBI to disclose the donor details. SBI claims that matching bond buyers with beneficiary political parties is a time-consuming process. Is this claim believable?

Women are often disproportionately affected during communal violence in India; their bodies become battlegrounds for expressing power, domination and revenge among conflicting groups. This not only highlights the gender inequality but also underscores the societal norms that perpetuate violence against women in this country, as we recently witnessed in Manipur.

A think tank in Sri Lanka has published a study suggesting methods to encourage social media platforms to undertake content moderation more responsibly, thus tackling hate speech and disinformation more effectively. The study offers an alternative to stringent legislative measures, which frequently result in excessive government control over content regulation.

A former Delhi University professor and five others, including a journalist and a student of Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi, were acquitted by the Bombay High Court on March 5 in a case linking them to Maoist activities, according to media reports. The verdict came after a prolonged legal battle that highlighted significant procedural and evidentiary issues related to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).