US Punishes India With 50% Tariff Over Russian Oil, What It Means
Higher Prices, Job Losses May Follow Amid Diplomatic Pressure
August 7, 2025
The United States government, under President Donald Trump, has issued an executive order that imposes a further 25 percent tariff on India for its purchases of oil from Russia. This brings the total tariff rate applied by the U.S. on India to 50 percent. This move places significant pressure on India's trade and energy strategies, especially as the country seeks to manage its dependence on energy imports while deepening ties with both the U.S. and Russia.
According to the executive order, these tariffs are set to take effect after a 21-day window from the date of signing. The interim period has been provided as a possible opportunity for India and Russia to engage with the United States and attempt to negotiate terms around the new tariff regime. The tariff specifically targets India’s continued oil imports from Russia, an arrangement that has grown substantially since 2022, as India has capitalised on discounted Russian crude amid sanctions placed by Western governments following the invasion of Ukraine.
The move comes amid an ongoing effort by the Trump administration to recalibrate global trade flows and apply pressure on countries perceived to be circumventing U.S. foreign policy goals. While China, a major buyer of Russian oil, has faced a 30 percent tariff on its exports to the U.S., the tariff on India is now markedly higher. The decision could realign the commercial and diplomatic relationship between Washington and New Delhi, especially considering that India has been identified by American firms as a potential substitute for China in global manufacturing supply chains.
Tariffs are a form of trade barrier that raise the cost of imported goods. In economic terms, the 50 percent tariff can be classified as a punitive or retaliatory tariff, which is designed to discourage a specific policy action or trade behaviour by a partner country. The increased tariff rate will make Indian goods and services costlier in the U.S. market and could trigger a reduction in Indian exports, particularly in sectors that are energy intensive. Moreover, firms in the U.S. that depend on Indian inputs or finished goods may face higher operational costs, creating inflationary pressures that could erode consumer demand or shift sourcing to other countries.
The impact on India’s balance of trade could be substantial. India has maintained a growing trade surplus with the United States, which is one of its largest export destinations. A high tariff barrier would directly reduce the competitiveness of Indian exports in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, information technology services and processed goods. If demand from U.S. buyers falls due to higher prices, India could face lower foreign exchange earnings, widening the current account deficit. A current account deficit reflects the shortfall between a country’s earnings from exports and its expenditure on imports and other international obligations. A widening deficit tends to put pressure on a country’s currency and may lead to depreciation of the Indian rupee.
In addition to trade implications, this move affects India’s energy security. India imports more than 80 percent of its crude oil requirements and has increasingly relied on Russian crude because of price discounts following Western sanctions. Russian oil has enabled India to manage inflation and keep retail fuel prices in check. Higher tariffs imposed by the U.S. on India for these purchases introduce a political cost to this energy arrangement. India may be forced to diversify away from Russian crude, potentially leading to higher import bills. A more expensive energy basket would increase input costs across the Indian economy, raising the price of goods and services and placing pressure on inflation control efforts by the Reserve Bank of India.
This development also carries significant geopolitical implications. India has tried to maintain strategic autonomy in its foreign policy, balancing relationships with the United States, Russia and the European Union. The U.S. decision signals a hardening of Washington’s stance against economic engagements with Russia and introduces a test for India’s multi-alignment strategy.
If India decides to reduce oil imports from Russia to avoid penalties, it could strain its ties with Moscow, which has been a long-time defence and energy partner. Alternatively, if India chooses to continue buying Russian oil despite the tariffs, it may enter a phase of diplomatic tension with Washington, risking the stability of defence, technology and trade cooperation that has grown over the last decade.
Another consequence concerns investor confidence. India has emerged in recent years as a leading candidate for companies looking to diversify manufacturing away from China. American firms, concerned about trade tensions with Beijing and the risks of depending entirely on Chinese supply chains, have explored moving some of their operations to India. This is part of what is commonly known as the “China plus one” strategy. The decision to impose high tariffs on India complicates this shift and could reduce India’s attractiveness as an investment destination.
India’s domestic political leadership may also face pressure to respond, either through reciprocal trade measures or by making diplomatic efforts to ease the tariff burden. A retaliatory tariff on U.S. goods could escalate tensions and produce further trade imbalances. Alternatively, a decision to comply with U.S. demands by reducing Russian imports may attract criticism domestically for yielding to external pressure. Either scenario narrows India’s policy space and forces difficult trade-offs between economic expediency and strategic independence.
The use of tariffs as a foreign policy tool in this context also weakens norms of multilateral trade governance. Global trade has historically been managed through institutions such as the World Trade Organization, which promotes rule-based trading systems. The decision to apply a unilateral penalty on India over its dealings with a third country represents a shift towards economic coercion. This trend of weaponising trade introduces unpredictability in the global market and increases the vulnerability of countries like India, which are deeply integrated into global supply chains but do not have the same bargaining power as the major economic blocs.
The U.S. move may have a direct impact on ordinary citizens, leading to higher prices at petrol pumps, as well as increase the cost of transportation, electricity and goods across the board. Another area of concern is jobs and income stability. Thos working in garments, leather, pharmaceuticals, processed food and IT services sectors may see slower growth or job losses. Further, a weaker rupee could also make imports costlier. That includes cooking oil, edible items, industrial machinery, smartphones and consumer electronics. Indian families that depend on remittances from relatives abroad may find that the rupee’s fall offsets the value of that income. Higher inflation may also force the Reserve Bank of India to raise interest rates in order to control prices. That would increase borrowing costs, making home loans, car loans and small business credit more expensive.
You have just read a News Briefing by Newsreel Asia, written to cut through the noise and present a single story for the day that matters to you. Certain briefings, based on media reports, seek to keep readers informed about events across India, others offer a perspective rooted in humanitarian concerns and some provide our own exclusive reporting. We encourage you to read the News Briefing each day. Our objective is to help you become not just an informed citizen, but an engaged and responsible one.
