Rethink Careers, Suggests New Microsoft Report on AI and Jobs

Microsoft Flags 40 Jobs AI Can Already Do

August 2, 2025

A new Microsoft Research study has identified 40 occupations where AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot can already perform many core tasks, including writing, some aspects of journalism, customer support and data analysis. This makes it essential for students and professionals at all levels to prepare for a future where such roles, especially in office-based sectors, may be restructured, reduced or phased out as automation becomes more deeply embedded in workplace systems.

The study introduces an “AI applicability score” to identify jobs where AI is already integrated into workflows. Microsoft clarifies that the study does not predict definite job losses. Rather, it shows how closely current AI tools match the routine tasks performed in certain roles. Even so, the list has raised concern because it includes many roles typically taken up at the start or middle of a career, which are often used to gain experience, build skills and move up in white-collar professions.

The highest-ranked jobs include customer service representatives, technical writers, editors, journalists, interpreters, PR specialists and data analysts. These are followed by professions like web developers, economics teachers, sales agents, brokerage clerks and even personal financial advisors. All these jobs share one feature: they require processing, generating or managing information, which AI tools are increasingly equipped to handle.

On the other end, the study lists jobs considered safe from disruption by current AI models. These include roles that involve physical labour or hands-on tasks. Examples include cooks, cleaning staff, construction workers, gardeners, hospital staff who draw blood for tests, and road maintenance workers who operate heavy machinery. Microsoft notes that current AI tools cannot carry out the physical movements, coordination or on-the-spot decision-making that these hands-on jobs involve.

Importantly, Microsoft warns against assuming that job overlap with AI always leads to displacement. It cites the example of ATMs, which reduced the need for manual cash handling but expanded bank teller roles by freeing up time for customer interaction. The study calls for a nuanced understanding of how AI might assist rather than eliminate roles, even in high-risk categories.

For students and young professionals, the overlap between AI tools and entry-level roles means that career ladders may shift or break. Traditionally, jobs such as editing, reporting, translation, customer service, or junior data analysis have served as training grounds, allowing young workers to build experience, networks and industry knowledge. If AI takes over the early stages of these roles, it could disrupt the pipeline through which workers grow into mid-career or specialist positions. This could limit chances for gaining practical experience on the job, making it harder for young jobseekers to build skills and compete, especially those without access to other learning opportunities.

For mid-career professionals, the risk is in being sidelined or made redundant. Many are in roles where AI tools are already being used to simplify and speed up tasks. Some may benefit from this shift, but others could see their responsibilities reduced or reshaped to fit what AI can do. Those who do not quickly learn to work with or manage AI tools may struggle to stay relevant. The pressure is especially high in sectors like publishing, finance and marketing, where performance is closely tied to speed and output, and AI is becoming central to how work is measured.

Senior professionals are less exposed to task-level automation, but they face pressure of a different kind. As organisations invest in AI transformation, senior staff must be able to evaluate risks, integrate new tools strategically and guide their teams through transitions. Those who fail to engage with AI meaningfully risk becoming bottlenecks in otherwise agile systems. For them, the challenge is about leadership credibility and the ability to justify their roles in ecosystems where decision-making is increasingly data-assisted or algorithmically driven.

From an economic point of view, this widening gap between AI-exposed and AI-resistant jobs creates a structural challenge in the job market. Roles that need physical presence or manual work are mostly unaffected for now, but they tend to offer lower wages, less stability and fewer long-term prospects. At the same time, white-collar jobs that were once valued for skills like analysis, writing or client communication are now under pressure, as generative AI can quickly produce reports, handle queries and process information that once required human effort.

This reversal of the traditional link between education and job security creates a challenge for policymakers. Labour markets have long operated on the belief that higher education leads to more stable and better-paid jobs. If AI begins to weaken this connection, the motivation to pursue higher studies could decline, particularly among lower-income families. Students may start to question whether degrees in fields like communication, journalism, data science or social sciences are still worthwhile if the entry-level jobs they lead to are increasingly handled by machines.

Another effect is the concentration of opportunity around AI-proficient professionals and industries. Those who can integrate AI into their own work, by using tools, designing prompts, reviewing outputs and building new workflows, are more likely to stay competitive. This favours workers who already have digital fluency and are situated in companies willing to retrain staff. It disadvantages those in smaller firms or less tech-savvy sectors, widening the gap between urban and rural labour markets, or between core and peripheral economies.

The study also confirms a change in what employers now demand. Beyond technical AI knowledge, they increasingly seek soft skills that machines cannot replicate easily – judgement, ethics, team coordination, stakeholder communication. But these are typically developed through experience, which is hard to gain if early-career roles themselves are automated. This creates a paradox for students and young workers, who are expected to demonstrate skills that require access to the very jobs being transformed.

For individuals across age groups and industries, the central challenge is not whether AI will replace them, but whether they are positioned to grow alongside it.

You have just read a News Briefing by Newsreel Asia, written to cut through the noise and present a single story for the day that matters to you. Certain briefings, based on media reports, seek to keep readers informed about events across India, others offer a perspective rooted in humanitarian concerns and some provide our own exclusive reporting. We encourage you to read the News Briefing each day. Our objective is to help you become not just an informed citizen, but an engaged and responsible one.